Psychology Basics

Psychology of Chronic Pain

Chronic pain is never "all in the head", but thoughts, emotions, attention and social context change how pain is felt and how much it disrupts life. This guide explains the science and the psychological approaches studied for it.

On this page
  1. Understanding Chronic Pain
  2. Common Chronic Pain Conditions
  3. Psychological Factors in Chronic Pain
  4. Psychological Assessment of Chronic Pain
  5. Evidence-Based Psychological Treatments
  6. Self-Management and Coping Strategies
  7. Special Populations and Considerations
  8. Resources and Support
  9. Criticisms and Limitations
  10. Conclusion
  11. Frequently asked questions
  12. Sources

Understanding Chronic Pain

The psychology of chronic pain is the study of how thoughts, emotions, behavior and social context interact with the nervous system to shape persistent pain. Chronic pain is pain that persists or recurs for longer than three months, the threshold used in ICD-11. Unlike acute pain, which serves as a protective warning signal, chronic pain often continues after the original injury has healed. It affects roughly one in five adults, making it one of the most common reasons people seek medical care.

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) revised its definition in 2020: pain is "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage." The definition matters for psychology because it makes emotion part of pain itself and notes that pain cannot be inferred solely from activity in sensory neurons. Pain is always a personal experience, influenced to differing degrees by biological, psychological and social factors.

From Descartes to gate control

For centuries, pain was explained with a simple "alarm wire" model often traced to René Descartes: injury sends a signal along a nerve to the brain, and the amount of pain matches the amount of damage. That model could not explain why soldiers with severe wounds sometimes report little pain, why phantom limb pain occurs, or why identical injuries produce very different disability in different people.

In 1965 Ronald Melzack and Patrick Wall proposed gate control theory. They argued that a "gate" in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord modulates incoming pain signals, and that signals descending from the brain (attention, mood, expectation) can open or close it. Melzack later extended this into the neuromatrix theory, describing pain as an output of a widely distributed brain network rather than a direct readout of tissue damage. These ideas opened the door to psychological approaches to pain, and they connect closely with research on sensation and perception and neuroplasticity.

The biopsychosocial model, introduced by George Engel in 1977, has transformed our understanding of chronic pain. This framework recognizes that pain perception results from the dynamic interplay of biological processes (such as tissue damage and nervous system sensitization), psychological factors (including thoughts, emotions, and behaviors), and social influences (such as cultural beliefs, family dynamics, and socioeconomic status). This integrated approach has replaced the outdated Cartesian dualist view that separated mind and body, acknowledging instead that psychological factors can profoundly influence physical pain sensations and vice versa.

Prevalence and Impact

  • Chronic pain affected approximately 20.4% of U.S. adults (about 50 million people) in 2016 CDC data
  • About 8% of adults (19.6 million) experience high-impact chronic pain that limits life or work activities
  • Estimated U.S. economic cost of $560–635 billion per year (Gaskin & Richard, 2012)
  • More prevalent in women, older adults, and those with lower socioeconomic status
  • Low back pain is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide (Global Burden of Disease studies)
  • Commonly associated with depression and anxiety disorders

Neuroplasticity plays a crucial role in chronic pain development. When pain signals persist over time, the nervous system can undergo maladaptive changes, becoming increasingly sensitive to pain stimuli—a process known as central sensitization. This can result in allodynia (pain from normally non-painful stimuli) and hyperalgesia (heightened pain sensitivity). These neuroplastic changes occur at multiple levels of the nervous system, from peripheral nerves to the spinal cord and brain, fundamentally altering how pain is processed and perceived.

Common Chronic Pain Conditions

Fibromyalgia

A chronic disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive difficulties. Affects 2-4% of the population, predominantly women. Research indicates abnormal pain processing in the central nervous system, with heightened sensitivity to pain stimuli. Psychological factors including stress, trauma history, and mood disorders significantly influence symptom severity.

Chronic Back Pain

The leading cause of years lived with disability globally; Global Burden of Disease estimates put the number of people with low back pain at more than 600 million in 2020. While some cases have identifiable structural causes, up to 85% of chronic back pain is classified as non-specific, with psychological factors playing a substantial role in pain persistence and disability. Fear-avoidance beliefs and pain catastrophizing are particularly important psychological predictors of chronicity.

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)

A chronic pain condition typically affecting a limb after injury, surgery, stroke, or heart attack. Characterized by severe burning pain, swelling, skin changes, and impaired motor function. Involves both peripheral and central nervous system dysfunction, with psychological stress potentially triggering or exacerbating symptoms. Requires multidisciplinary treatment including psychological intervention.

Chronic Headaches and Migraines

Affecting over 1 billion people worldwide, chronic headache disorders significantly impact quality of life. Migraines show strong associations with anxiety, depression, and stress. Psychological triggers including emotional stress, sleep disturbances, and certain behaviors can precipitate or worsen symptoms. Biofeedback, relaxation training and cognitive-behavioral approaches have research support for reducing headache frequency in some people. See our overview of migraine.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)

A functional gastrointestinal disorder affecting 10-15% of the population, characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, and altered bowel habits. The gut-brain axis plays a central role, with psychological stress significantly influencing symptom severity. High comorbidity with anxiety and depression. Gut-directed hypnotherapy and CBT have some of the strongest evidence among psychological approaches for IBS. See irritable bowel syndrome for more.

Psychological Factors in Chronic Pain

Pain Catastrophizing

Pain catastrophizing refers to an exaggerated negative cognitive-affective response to anticipated or actual pain. It involves three components: rumination (excessive focus on pain sensations), magnification (exaggerating the threat value of pain), and helplessness (perceiving oneself as unable to cope with pain). Research consistently shows that pain catastrophizing is one of the strongest psychological predictors of pain intensity, disability, and poor treatment outcomes. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a widely used 13-item measure that assesses these dimensions.

Neuroimaging studies reveal that pain catastrophizing is associated with increased activation in brain regions involved in pain processing, including the anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex. These findings suggest that catastrophic thinking doesn't simply reflect emotional distress but actively modulates pain perception through top-down neural mechanisms. Interventions targeting catastrophizing, such as cognitive restructuring and mindfulness-based approaches, can significantly reduce both catastrophizing and pain intensity.

Fear-Avoidance Model

The fear-avoidance model, set out in an influential 2000 review by Johan Vlaeyen and Steven Linton and building on earlier work by Lethem and colleagues (1983), describes how fear of pain can lead to chronic disability. When individuals experience acute pain, they may interpret it catastrophically, leading to pain-related fear and anxiety. This fear motivates avoidance of activities believed to cause or increase pain. While avoidance may provide short-term relief, it leads to physical deconditioning, increased disability, and paradoxically, greater pain sensitivity over time. This creates a vicious cycle where avoidance maintains and exacerbates the pain problem.

Breaking this cycle requires exposure-based interventions that gradually challenge fear-avoidance beliefs. Graded exposure involves systematically confronting feared movements or activities in a controlled manner, allowing individuals to discover that movement doesn't necessarily cause harm or unbearable pain. This approach, derived from anxiety disorder treatment, has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing pain-related fear and improving function in chronic pain populations.

Depression and Anxiety

The relationship between chronic pain and mood disorders is bidirectional and complex. Studies in pain clinics have reported that a substantial minority of patients, often estimated at 30-50% depending on the setting and measure, meet criteria for major depression, well above general-population rates. Depression can amplify pain perception through shared neural pathways and neurotransmitter systems, particularly involving serotonin and norepinephrine. Depressed individuals often show heightened attention to pain, reduced pain tolerance, and increased pain-related disability.

Anxiety disorders, particularly generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder, are also highly prevalent in chronic pain populations. Anxiety can heighten arousal and muscle tension, potentially increasing pain. Additionally, anxiety-driven hypervigilance to bodily sensations can amplify pain perception and create anticipatory anxiety about pain episodes. Clinicians therefore usually assess mood and anxiety as part of pain care, and treatment plans often address both together.

Trauma and Adverse Childhood Experiences

Research increasingly recognizes the role of trauma and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in chronic pain development. Studies show dose-response relationships between ACE exposure and chronic pain conditions in adulthood. Potential mechanisms include altered stress response systems, inflammatory processes, and changes in pain processing pathways. Trauma can also contribute to maladaptive coping strategies, dissociation, and difficulties with emotional regulation that complicate pain management.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) shows particularly high comorbidity with chronic pain, with estimates ranging from 10-50% depending on the population studied. Shared symptoms include hyperarousal, avoidance, and attentional biases. Trauma-focused therapies such as Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy may benefit individuals with comorbid chronic pain and trauma histories, though more research is needed in this area.

Stress and the HPA Axis

Chronic stress profoundly affects pain through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and autonomic nervous system. Prolonged stress exposure can lead to HPA axis dysregulation, characterized by altered cortisol patterns that may contribute to inflammation, decreased pain tolerance, and central sensitization. Chronic pain itself acts as a persistent stressor, potentially creating feedback loops between stress and pain that perpetuate the condition.

Psychological Assessment of Chronic Pain

Comprehensive psychological assessment is essential for understanding the multidimensional nature of chronic pain and developing effective treatment plans. Assessment should evaluate pain characteristics, psychological factors, functional impact, and treatment goals. A thorough biopsychosocial assessment provides the foundation for personalized, evidence-based intervention.

Pain Assessment Measures

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

A 0-10 scale where patients rate pain intensity, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst pain imaginable." Simple and quick to administer, though provides limited information about pain quality or impact.

McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)

A comprehensive measure assessing sensory, affective, and evaluative dimensions of pain using descriptive word lists. Provides rich qualitative information about pain experience. The Short-Form MPQ offers a briefer alternative for clinical use.

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

Assesses pain intensity and interference with daily activities including mood, sleep, work, and relationships. Widely used in research and clinical settings, particularly for cancer pain but applicable to various chronic pain conditions.

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

A 13-item questionnaire assessing rumination, magnification, and helplessness related to pain. Strong predictor of pain outcomes and treatment response, making it valuable for treatment planning and monitoring.

Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

Measures fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity and work. Particularly useful for identifying patients who may benefit from exposure-based interventions and addressing maladaptive beliefs about movement.

Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)

Assesses pain acceptance, including activity engagement and pain willingness. Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) principles, higher acceptance scores predict better functioning and quality of life.

Assessment should also include screening for depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), trauma history, sleep quality, and functional impairment. Integrating these measures provides a comprehensive understanding of how psychological factors influence pain and guides intervention selection.

Evidence-Based Psychological Treatments

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (CBT-CP)

CBT-CP, an adaptation of cognitive behavioral therapy, is the most extensively researched psychological intervention for chronic pain, with robust evidence supporting its efficacy across various pain conditions. CBT-CP operates on the principle that thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and physical sensations are interconnected and mutually influence one another. The therapy aims to identify and modify maladaptive pain-related thoughts and behaviors while developing adaptive coping strategies.

Core CBT-CP components include: psychoeducation about the biopsychosocial model of pain; cognitive restructuring to challenge catastrophic thinking and unhelpful pain beliefs; behavioral activation to increase engagement in valued activities; pacing and activity management to prevent boom-bust cycles; relaxation training; problem-solving skills; and relapse prevention. Cochrane reviews report small benefits for pain intensity and somewhat larger, though still modest, benefits for disability, distress and catastrophizing, with effects that vary considerably between studies.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

ACT for chronic pain represents a shift from pain control to acceptance and values-based living. Rather than focusing on reducing pain intensity, ACT emphasizes psychological flexibility—the ability to remain present-focused and engage in valued activities even in the presence of pain. This approach recognizes that attempts to control or eliminate chronic pain often prove futile and may paradoxically increase suffering.

ACT utilizes six core processes: acceptance (willingness to experience pain without struggle), cognitive defusion (creating distance from pain-related thoughts), present moment awareness (mindful attention), self-as-context (observing perspective), values clarification (identifying what matters most), and committed action (values-consistent behavior). Research, including randomized trials and meta-analyses, shows ACT produces improvements in functioning, pain acceptance, anxiety, and depression, with effects comparable to or exceeding CBT in some studies.

Mindfulness-Based Interventions

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), which Jon Kabat-Zinn first developed in 1979 partly for patients with chronic pain, and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) have shown promise for chronic pain management. These 8-week group programs teach formal meditation practices (body scan, sitting meditation, mindful movement) and informal mindfulness skills applied to daily life. Mindfulness cultivates non-judgmental awareness of present-moment experience, including pain sensations, thoughts, and emotions.

Research indicates that mindfulness practice can alter pain perception by decoupling the sensory component of pain from its affective and cognitive dimensions. Neuroimaging studies show mindfulness meditation reduces activity in brain regions associated with pain unpleasantness while maintaining or increasing activity in sensory processing areas. Systematic reviews report moderate effects on pain intensity and larger effects on depression and quality of life.

Biofeedback and Relaxation Training

Biofeedback provides real-time information about physiological processes (muscle tension, heart rate, skin temperature, brain waves) to help individuals develop voluntary control over these functions. For chronic pain, biofeedback training typically focuses on reducing muscle tension and promoting relaxation responses. Electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback has demonstrated particular efficacy for tension headaches and temporomandibular disorders.

Progressive muscle relaxation, guided imagery, deep breathing, and autogenic training represent additional relaxation-based approaches. These techniques activate the parasympathetic nervous system, counteracting stress-related physiological arousal that can exacerbate pain. While relaxation training alone may have modest effects, it serves as a valuable component within comprehensive pain management programs.

Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy

Clinical hypnosis involves guided focused attention and suggestion to modify pain perception and pain-related distress. Hypnotic interventions may target pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, or both, using suggestions for analgesia, altered pain sensations, or dissociation from pain. Research supports hypnosis as a useful adjunctive approach for several chronic pain conditions, although study quality varies and effects differ widely between individuals.

Gut-directed hypnotherapy has emerged as a particularly effective intervention for irritable bowel syndrome, with long-term follow-up studies showing sustained improvements in pain and overall symptoms. Self-hypnosis training allows patients to apply techniques independently, enhancing treatment accessibility and promoting self-management.

Interdisciplinary Pain Management Programs

Interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs are widely regarded as a leading approach for complex chronic pain. These intensive programs integrate medical, psychological, physical, and occupational therapy within a coordinated team approach. Program formats vary; intensive versions often run for several weeks with daily attendance, addressing physical reconditioning, psychological factors, medical review and functional restoration.

Systematic reviews (for example, Kamper and colleagues, 2015, for low back pain) suggest interdisciplinary programs can produce better outcomes than usual care or single-modality treatments, with improvements in pain, function, mood, medication use, and return to work. While resource-intensive, these programs are cost-effective for patients with severe, treatment-resistant pain when considering reduced healthcare utilization, decreased opioid use, and improved work status.

Self-Management and Coping Strategies

Pacing and Activity Management

Pacing involves balancing activity and rest to maintain consistent function while avoiding overexertion. Many chronic pain patients fall into boom-bust cycles, overdoing activities on good days and paying the price with increased pain and inactivity. Effective pacing includes: breaking tasks into smaller segments; taking scheduled rest breaks before pain increases; gradually increasing activity levels; and prioritizing important activities.

Activity pacing differs from avoidance in that it promotes engagement with life while respecting current limitations. The goal is sustainable activity patterns that support gradual reconditioning rather than dramatic fluctuations that perpetuate disability. Research shows that adaptive pacing strategies (increasing activity despite pain) predict better outcomes than avoidance-based pacing.

Sleep Hygiene and Pain

Sleep disturbance affects 50-90% of chronic pain patients and represents both a consequence and contributor to pain. Poor sleep increases pain sensitivity, reduces pain tolerance, and exacerbates mood problems. Conversely, pain often disrupts sleep through direct discomfort or indirect mechanisms like stress and hyperarousal. This bidirectional relationship creates cycles where pain and sleep problems mutually reinforce one another.

General sleep hygiene practices include: maintaining consistent sleep-wake schedules; creating a comfortable sleep environment; limiting stimulants and screens before bed; developing relaxing bedtime routines; and discussing with a doctor any medication effects on sleep. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) adapted for chronic pain addresses pain-specific sleep challenges while incorporating standard CBT-I components like sleep restriction and stimulus control.

Social Support and Communication

Social relationships significantly influence pain outcomes, with supportive relationships generally associated with better adjustment and solicitous or punishing responses often linked to greater disability. Partners and family members may inadvertently reinforce pain behaviors through excessive attention to pain complaints or by taking over the patient's responsibilities. Conversely, dismissive or invalidating responses can increase distress and isolation.

Effective pain communication involves assertively expressing needs while avoiding excessive pain talk that can strain relationships. Pain management programs often include partner or family education to promote helpful support behaviors, improve communication, and address the impact of chronic pain on relationships. Support groups, whether in-person or online, can reduce isolation and provide peer modeling of adaptive coping.

Exercise and Physical Activity

Regular exercise represents one of the most effective self-management strategies for chronic pain, with benefits for pain intensity, physical function, and psychological well-being. Exercise can reduce pain through multiple mechanisms including endorphin release, anti-inflammatory effects, improved sleep, enhanced mood, and increased self-efficacy. The type, intensity, and duration of exercise should be tailored to individual capabilities and gradually progressed.

Overcoming fear of movement (kinesiophobia) often requires psychological intervention alongside physical rehabilitation. Graded exposure to feared movements, combined with education about the safety and benefits of activity, helps patients rebuild confidence and physical capacity. Low-impact activities like walking, swimming, tai chi, and yoga are often well-tolerated starting points.

Meaning and Purpose

Finding meaning and maintaining valued life roles despite chronic pain contributes to psychological resilience and better adjustment. Pain can threaten identity, particularly when it limits work, hobbies, and social roles. Acceptance-based approaches encourage patients to clarify personal values and pursue valued activities even when pain persists. Engaging in meaningful activity provides a sense of purpose that transcends pain and supports well-being.

Special Populations and Considerations

Pediatric Chronic Pain

Chronic pain affects 20-35% of children and adolescents worldwide, with common conditions including headaches, abdominal pain, and musculoskeletal pain. Pediatric pain requires family-centered approaches that address child coping, parent responses, and family functioning. Parent behaviors such as protective responses and excessive monitoring can inadvertently reinforce pain-related disability. Parent-focused interventions teaching adaptive pain management and reduced accommodation show promise for improving child outcomes.

Older Adults

Chronic pain prevalence increases with age, affecting over 50% of community-dwelling older adults and up to 80% of nursing home residents. Older adults face unique challenges including multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy risks, and age-related cognitive changes. Psychological interventions may require adaptations for sensory impairments, cognitive limitations, and different cohort attitudes toward mental health treatment. Despite these challenges, older adults can benefit substantially from psychological pain management approaches.

Cultural Considerations

Cultural beliefs and practices shape pain expression, interpretation, and treatment seeking. Cultural factors influence pain tolerance, acceptable pain behaviors, preferred coping strategies, and explanatory models of pain. Effective cross-cultural pain care requires cultural humility, awareness of one's own cultural biases, and adaptation of interventions to align with patients' cultural values and beliefs. Language barriers, health literacy, and culturally-specific trauma experiences must also be considered.

Opioid Use and Dependence

The opioid crisis has highlighted the complex intersection of chronic pain and substance use. While opioids can provide short-term analgesia, long-term use often leads to tolerance, hyperalgesia (increased pain sensitivity), and dependence. Psychological factors including catastrophizing, depression, and trauma history predict higher opioid use and greater risk of misuse. Any change to pain medication should be planned with the prescribing clinician; psychologists contribute by helping people build non-drug coping skills and by addressing the distress that often accompanies medication changes.

Resources and Support

Professional Organizations

  • American Psychological Association (APA) Division 38: Society for Health Psychology
  • International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP): Multidisciplinary pain research and education
  • American Chronic Pain Association (ACPA): Patient education and support resources

The American Pain Society, once a leading U.S. professional body, dissolved in 2019; its work continues through other organizations such as the U.S. Association for the Study of Pain.

Finding Treatment

Seeking qualified pain psychologists or interdisciplinary pain programs:

  • APA Psychologist Locator for health psychologists with pain specialization
  • Ask primary care or pain medicine providers for referrals
  • Academic medical centers often have comprehensive pain clinics
  • Verify credentials including state licensure and relevant certifications
  • Many insurers cover telehealth psychological services; see our guide on finding a therapist

Criticisms and Limitations

Psychological pain research has real limits that are worth stating plainly. Effect sizes for pain intensity are mostly small, many trials are short, and control conditions are hard to design (there is no true "placebo psychotherapy"). Patients are often recruited from specialist clinics, so findings may not generalize to people managing pain in the community.

There is also a risk of misuse. Emphasizing psychological factors can slide into the harmful message that pain is "psychological" and therefore less real, and people with conditions such as endometriosis or autoimmune disease have reported having physical causes overlooked for years. Good practice keeps medical assessment and psychological care side by side. Finally, access is uneven: interdisciplinary programs and pain psychologists are scarce in many regions, which is one reason digital and group-based programs are being studied.

Conclusion

The psychology of chronic pain has evolved dramatically over recent decades, moving from dualistic mind-body separations to integrated biopsychosocial understanding. Research unequivocally demonstrates that psychological factors profoundly influence pain perception, disability, and treatment outcomes. While chronic pain presents significant challenges, evidence-based psychological interventions offer realistic hope for improved functioning and quality of life.

Effective pain management requires acknowledging pain as a valid, multidimensional experience while developing adaptive responses that support engagement with meaningful life activities. The broader field this belongs to is health psychology. Whether through formal psychological treatment or self-directed coping strategies, individuals with chronic pain can develop psychological flexibility, resilience, and skills that enable fuller lives despite ongoing pain. As our understanding of pain neuroscience and psychological processes continues to advance, increasingly sophisticated and personalized interventions will emerge to serve this significant population.

Frequently asked questions

Does a psychological approach mean my pain is imaginary?

No. Psychological approaches are used because all pain is processed by the nervous system, and attention, mood, stress and beliefs influence that processing. Pain psychologists treat pain as completely real. Their aim is to reduce suffering and disability by changing the factors that amplify pain or keep people stuck, alongside medical and physical care rather than instead of it.

What is the difference between acute and chronic pain?

Acute pain is short-term and usually linked to a clear injury or illness; it acts as a protective warning and fades as tissues heal. Chronic pain persists or recurs for more than three months. In many cases the nervous system itself has become more sensitive, so pain continues beyond normal healing and stops being a reliable signal of ongoing damage.

What is pain catastrophizing?

Pain catastrophizing is a pattern of responding to pain with rumination, magnification and helplessness, for example dwelling on the pain, expecting the worst, and feeling unable to cope. It is measured with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale developed by Michael Sullivan and colleagues in 1995. Higher scores predict greater pain intensity and disability, and catastrophizing often decreases with CBT, ACT and related therapies.

Which professionals work on the psychology of chronic pain?

Health psychologists and clinical psychologists with pain training, often working in hospital pain clinics or interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams alongside physicians, physiotherapists and occupational therapists. A primary care doctor is usually the first point of contact and can refer to pain services. Some psychologists also deliver pain programs online, which research suggests can help when local services are limited.

Does psychological therapy reduce pain intensity?

Usually modestly. Cochrane reviews of CBT for chronic pain in adults found small benefits for pain intensity, with somewhat clearer improvements in disability, distress and catastrophizing. Many programs therefore focus on helping people do more of what matters and suffer less from pain, rather than promising that pain will disappear. Results vary considerably between individuals and conditions.

Sources

  1. Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129–136.
  2. Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965). Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science, 150(3699), 971–979.
  3. Raja, S. N., et al. (2020). The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: Concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain, 161(9), 1976–1982.
  4. Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000). Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art. Pain, 85(3), 317–332.
  5. Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 524–532.
  6. Dahlhamer, J., et al. (2018). Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults — United States, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(36), 1001–1006.
  7. Williams, A. C. de C., Fisher, E., Hearn, L., & Eccleston, C. (2020). Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
  8. World Health Organization. ICD-11: Chronic pain (MG30).

About this page. Written and reviewed by the iPsychology Editorial Team using peer-reviewed research, textbooks and guidance from bodies such as the APA, NIMH, NHS and WHO. Content is educational and is not a substitute for professional advice. Spotted an error? Let us know.